Boundaries with In-Laws

Small Group Workbook

Discussion questions and exercises for 60-90 minute sessions

Small Group Workbook: Boundaries with In-Laws

Session Overview and Goals

This session explores how married couples can establish and maintain healthy boundaries with extended family while preserving meaningful multi-generational relationships.

By the end of this session, participants will:

  1. Understand the biblical principle of "leaving and cleaving" and how it applies to in-law relationships
  2. Identify specific areas where boundaries may be unclear in their own family systems
  3. Develop practical language and strategies for addressing in-law dynamics constructively

Note to participants: This topic touches on family loyalty, which can bring up strong feelings. There's no single "right way" to handle in-law relationships—cultural backgrounds, family histories, and specific circumstances all matter. The goal today is to think more clearly about your own situation, not to judge anyone else's.


Teaching Summary

The Design Comes Before the Problem

Every in-law problem is really a design problem. Life doesn't start with problems—it starts with how things are supposed to work. When things go wrong, it's usually because the design was never established or something got twisted along the way.

For marriage, that design appears early in Scripture: "A man shall leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife." This principle shows up in nearly every wedding ceremony, but its implications often aren't understood until conflict surfaces.

What "Leaving" Actually Means

The Hebrew word for "leave" in this passage is strong—it carries the sense of forsaking or abandoning. That sounds harsh until you understand what's being left behind.

You're not leaving the relationship with your parents. Multi-generational connections are valuable, and in-laws, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins all matter. What you're leaving is the parental role—the arrangement where your parents serve as guardian, manager, resource provider, and primary voice of wisdom and authority in your life.

This is actually what healthy parenting builds toward. Good parents spend years preparing their children to leave. They teach skills, provide opportunities, build character, and then—painfully but proudly—watch their children walk into their own adult lives.

The Shift in Governance

Here's the central question for any in-law situation: Who has governance over this family unit?

When a couple marries, governance shifts. The couple becomes the decision-making authority for their family. They can—and should—seek wisdom from parents and in-laws. They can welcome input, advice, and support. But the final authority rests with them.

Problems emerge when this shift never clearly happens. Maybe the couple never defined it. Maybe the parents never accepted it. Maybe everyone assumed they were on the same page until a specific situation revealed they weren't.

Input vs. Control

There's a crucial difference between offering input and exercising control.

Healthy extended family involvement looks like: "Here's what we've learned from our experience. We hope it helps. Whatever you decide, we support you."

Unhealthy involvement looks like: "We need to be part of this decision. You should have consulted us first. We're hurt that you didn't do it our way."

The first respects the couple's autonomy while offering wisdom. The second treats the couple as if they're still children who need parental approval.

Sadness vs. Wrong

When parents feel hurt by their adult children's decisions, it's important to distinguish between two very different feelings:

  1. Sadness about a loss: "I wish you weren't moving away. I'll miss you. This is hard."
  2. Judgment about wrongdoing: "You should have consulted us. You've done something wrong by not including us."

The first is a normal human emotion. The second is a boundary violation. Adult children don't need parental permission to make life decisions, even decisions that affect or disappoint their parents.

Building Structure Where It Doesn't Exist

If the "leaving" was never clearly established—whether you've been married for two months or twenty years—you can build that structure now.

This means having direct conversations about expectations: How will holidays be handled? What role do grandparents play with the children? When is financial help appropriate, and what strings (if any) come attached? How do we handle disagreements between the couple and extended family?

Some families do this beautifully—sitting down together to discuss expectations and create agreements everyone can live with. "Here's how many holidays there are. Here's how we want to allocate them. Here's what involvement looks like. Here's where the governance sits."

The alternative is endless case-by-case battles where every situation becomes a new conflict because no one ever defined the framework.

For Parents of Adult Children

If you're on the other side of this equation—the parent who struggles to let go—the work is on you to release.

Your job was to prepare your children for independent adult life. Once they're there, your role changes from authority to advisor. You offer; you don't require. You suggest; you don't demand. You support; you don't control.

This is painful. Watching your child leave—whether for college, marriage, or simply adulthood—involves real grief. But it's good grief. It means you succeeded. You raised someone capable of living their own life.


Discussion Questions

  1. What stood out to you from the teaching? What was new, challenging, or clarifying?

  2. How would you describe the "leaving" process in your own life? Was there a clear moment when your relationship with your parents shifted? Or has it been more gradual—or maybe it hasn't fully happened yet?

  3. Where do you see the governance question playing out in your family? Are there areas where it's unclear whether you and your spouse have final authority, or where parents or in-laws still expect to be consulted? [Facilitator note: Give specific examples only if you're comfortable. You can discuss patterns without naming names.]

  4. How did your family of origin handle multi-generational boundaries? Was it healthy? What did you learn—good or bad—about how these relationships should work?

  5. Think about a time when extended family input was genuinely helpful. What made that situation work well? What was different about it compared to times when input felt controlling?

  6. How do you and your spouse handle disagreements about extended family? Do you tend to discuss privately and present a united front? Or do conflicts with in-laws sometimes become conflicts between you? [Facilitator note: This can be a vulnerable question. Normalize that most couples struggle here at least sometimes.]

  7. What would it look like to "budget" your extended family involvement? How do you currently allocate holidays, weekends, and other time? Has this been explicitly discussed, or does it just happen?

  8. For those who are parents of adult children: What's been hard about releasing your children into their own lives? Where have you had to adjust your expectations? [Allow silence here—this is a tender question for some.]

  9. What's one boundary conversation you've been avoiding? What makes it difficult to have? What might happen if you had it?

  10. How can a couple honor parents while still maintaining clear autonomy? What does that balance actually look like in practice?


Personal Reflection Exercises

Complete these individually, either during the session or at home.

Exercise 1: Mapping the Governance

Consider the major areas of your life and rate how clear the "governance" is—that is, how clear it is that you and your spouse are the final decision-makers.

Area Who decides? Clarity (1-5)
Where we live
How we spend money
How we raise our children
What church/faith community we're part of
How we spend holidays
How often we see extended family
Major career decisions
How we handle conflict

For any area rated 3 or below: What would need to change to bring clarity?

Exercise 2: Identifying Your Patterns

Answer honestly:

  1. When I disagree with my parents or in-laws, my typical response is to:

    • Avoid the conflict entirely
    • Give in to keep the peace
    • Fight back defensively
    • Have a direct, calm conversation
    • Let my spouse handle it
    • Other: ________________
  2. When my spouse disagrees with my parents, I typically:

    • Side with my spouse
    • Side with my parents
    • Try to stay neutral
    • Feel caught in the middle
    • Other: ________________
  3. The hardest part of in-law relationships for me is:


  4. One thing I wish my spouse understood about my family is:


Exercise 3: The Conversation You Need to Have

If there's a boundary that needs to be established or clarified with your extended family, draft what you might say. Write it as if you were speaking directly to the person.

"I want you to know that I value our relationship. And I need to be clear about something..."





Real-Life Scenarios

Discuss these as a group. There are no perfect answers—the goal is to think through how the principles apply.

Scenario 1: The Holiday Standoff

Marcus and Jen have been married for three years. Both sets of parents live within an hour of them and expect to see them for every major holiday. Thanksgiving has become a particular stress point—they've tried doing lunch at one house and dinner at the other, but everyone ends up unhappy with the "shorter" visit. Last year, Marcus's mom cried when they left for Jen's parents' house. This year, Jen says she wants to start their own Thanksgiving tradition at home and invite both families, but Marcus is worried his parents will feel like they're being "replaced."

Discussion prompts:

  • What's the underlying governance issue here?
  • How might Marcus and Jen approach this as a united team?
  • What would gracious but clear communication look like?

Scenario 2: The Helpful Parents

Rachel's parents have been incredibly generous—they helped with the down payment on Rachel and Daniel's house and regularly give money for the grandkids. Daniel appreciates the help but has started to notice that the generosity comes with expectations. Rachel's mom stops by unannounced, offers frequent opinions on parenting decisions, and recently suggested that since they "invested" in the house, they should have input on a renovation decision. When Daniel raised concerns to Rachel, she said he was being ungrateful.

Discussion prompts:

  • What's the connection between financial support and boundaries?
  • How might Daniel and Rachel get on the same page?
  • Is there a way to appreciate generosity while also addressing the boundary issues?

Scenario 3: The Son Who Never Left

Kim married Jason knowing he was close to his mother. But five years in, she's exhausted. Jason calls his mom every day, often sharing details about their marriage that Kim considers private. When they disagree about anything, Jason consults his mom. Last month, Kim found out that Jason had discussed a career opportunity with his mom before mentioning it to Kim. When she confronted him, he said, "She's my mom—I can talk to her about anything."

Discussion prompts:

  • What does healthy "leaving" look like vs. what's happening here?
  • How might Kim communicate her concerns without attacking Jason's relationship with his mother?
  • What might Jason need to understand about marriage and primary loyalty?

Practice Assignments

Between now and your next meeting, try one of these:

Option A: The Clarity Conversation

Have a private conversation with your spouse about one area of extended family involvement that could use more clarity. Don't try to solve everything—just pick one topic and discuss: What do we want? What are we currently doing? What would we like to change?

Option B: Notice the Patterns

This week, simply pay attention to interactions with extended family (yours or your spouse's). Notice: When does input feel welcome? When does it feel controlling? What triggers defensiveness in you? Just observe—you don't need to change anything yet.

Option C: Draft the Boundary

If you identified a conversation that needs to happen, spend 15 minutes writing out what you want to say. Don't send it yet—just clarify your own thinking. What's the core issue? What outcome are you hoping for? What's a gracious but clear way to communicate it?


Closing Reflection

Building healthy in-law relationships is both a one-time structure and an ongoing practice. The "leaving" doesn't happen once—it gets lived out in hundreds of small decisions over the years.

The goal isn't isolation from extended family. The goal is clarity that frees everyone to connect without control, to love without guilt, and to honor the design that makes marriage work.

You and your spouse are building something together—your own family, your own traditions, your own life. Extended family gets to be part of that, but they don't get to run it. That's not selfishness; that's the design.

Optional Closing Prayer:

God, we thank you for the gift of family—both the family we came from and the family we're building. Give us wisdom to honor our parents while being faithful to our spouses. Give us courage for the conversations that need to happen. And help us build something that reflects your design—families that are connected without being controlling, loving without being enmeshed. Amen.

Other resources on this topic

Want to go deeper?

Get daily coaching videos from Dr. Cloud and join a community of people committed to growth.

Explore Dr. Cloud Community